Ollama alapú vezetői elemzésÖsszkép: A vizsgált rendszerben két közepes súlyú biztonsági kockázatot azonosítottunk, amelyek a SSL tanúsítványok hibás konfigurációját és az SMB jelentkezési aláírás nélküliségét érintik. A rendszer általános biztonsági állapota közepes.
Fő kockázati témák: A legfontosabb megállapítások a hibás SSL tanúsítványok és az SMB jelentkezési aláírás nélkülisége, amelyek együttesen bizonyos támadási lehetőséget teremtenek.
Ajánlott 0–7 nap: A legfontosabb javaslatunk a hibás SSL tanúsítványok kijavítása és az SMB jelentkezési aláírás bekapcsolása, amely gyors és fontos lépés a rendszer biztonságának javításában.
Ajánlott 7–30 nap: A további javaslatunk a rendszer általános biztonsági szabályainak felülvizsgálata és a hardening folyamata, amelyek segítenek el
Közepes (3 típus / 5 összes)- SSL Certificate with Wrong Hostname
- SSL Certificate Cannot Be Trusted
- SMB Signing not required
Ollama: llama3.1:8b | ollama version is 0.14.2 | 2026-01-30 23:06
MEDIUM (5)
SSL Certificate with Wrong Hostname
Plugin ID: 45411
Port: tcp/443
The 'commonName' (CN) attribute of the SSL certificate presented for
this service is for a different machine.
Javasolt megoldás
Purchase or generate a proper SSL certificate for this service.
SSL Certificate with Wrong Hostname
Plugin ID: 45411
Port: tcp/5001
The 'commonName' (CN) attribute of the SSL certificate presented for
this service is for a different machine.
Javasolt megoldás
Purchase or generate a proper SSL certificate for this service.
SSL Certificate Cannot Be Trusted
Plugin ID: 51192
Port: tcp/443
The server's X.509 certificate cannot be trusted. This situation can
occur in three different ways, in which the chain of trust can be
broken, as stated below :
- First, the top of the certificate chain sent by the
server might not be descended from a known public
certificate authority. This can occur either when the
top of the chain is an unrecognized, self-signed
certificate, or when intermediate certificates are
missing that would connect the top of the certificate
chain to a known public certificate authority.
- Second, the certificate chain may contain a certificate
that is not valid at the time of the scan. This can
occur either when the scan occurs before one of the
certificate's 'notBefore' dates, or after one of the
certificate's 'notAfter' dates.
- Third, the certificate chain may contain a signature
that either didn't match the certificate's information
or could not be verified. Bad signatures can be fixed by
getting the certificate with the bad signature to be
re-signed by its issuer. Signatures that could not be
verified are the result of the certificate's issuer
using a signing algorithm that Nessus either does not
support or does not recognize.
If the remote host is a public host in production, any break in the
chain makes it more difficult for users to verify the authenticity and
identity of the web server. This could make it easier to carry out
man-in-the-middle attacks against the remote host.
Javasolt megoldás
Purchase or generate a proper SSL certificate for this service.
SSL Certificate Cannot Be Trusted
Plugin ID: 51192
Port: tcp/5001
The server's X.509 certificate cannot be trusted. This situation can
occur in three different ways, in which the chain of trust can be
broken, as stated below :
- First, the top of the certificate chain sent by the
server might not be descended from a known public
certificate authority. This can occur either when the
top of the chain is an unrecognized, self-signed
certificate, or when intermediate certificates are
missing that would connect the top of the certificate
chain to a known public certificate authority.
- Second, the certificate chain may contain a certificate
that is not valid at the time of the scan. This can
occur either when the scan occurs before one of the
certificate's 'notBefore' dates, or after one of the
certificate's 'notAfter' dates.
- Third, the certificate chain may contain a signature
that either didn't match the certificate's information
or could not be verified. Bad signatures can be fixed by
getting the certificate with the bad signature to be
re-signed by its issuer. Signatures that could not be
verified are the result of the certificate's issuer
using a signing algorithm that Nessus either does not
support or does not recognize.
If the remote host is a public host in production, any break in the
chain makes it more difficult for users to verify the authenticity and
identity of the web server. This could make it easier to carry out
man-in-the-middle attacks against the remote host.
Javasolt megoldás
Purchase or generate a proper SSL certificate for this service.
SMB Signing not required
Plugin ID: 57608
Port: tcp/445
Signing is not required on the remote SMB server. An unauthenticated,
remote attacker can exploit this to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks
against the SMB server.
Javasolt megoldás
Enforce message signing in the host's configuration. On Windows, this
is found in the policy setting 'Microsoft network server: Digitally
sign communications (always)'. On Samba, the setting is called 'server
signing'. See the 'see also' links for further details.
LOW (1)
ICMP Timestamp Request Remote Date Disclosure
The remote host answers to an ICMP timestamp request. This allows an
attacker to know the date that is set on the targeted machine, which
may assist an unauthenticated, remote attacker in defeating time-based
authentication protocols.
Timestamps returned from machines running Windows Vista / 7 / 2008 /
2008 R2 are deliberately incorrect, but usually within 1000 seconds of
the actual system time.
Javasolt megoldás
Filter out the ICMP timestamp requests (13), and the outgoing ICMP
timestamp replies (14).